Gigante v. Finlay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court decision applying “arbitrary and capricious” standard, citing Reiherzer with approval but articulating standard as “inherently inconsistent,” omitting reference to “arbitrary and capricious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).