Skip to main content
· 8/6/1996

Gifford v. Sun Data, Inc.

Citations

  • 686 A.2d 472
  • 165 Vt. 611
  • 1996 Vt. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prospective relationship “too speculative” where seller had previously tried, but failed, to sell to buyer
  • finding no improper interference with prospective business relationship where plaintiff did not make predictable sales to reliable customers and there was no evidence that the defendant used deceit to undermine the plaintiff’s business
  • “The jury may find inducement if the defendant’s acts caused the nonperformance of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, C.J., and Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.