Skip to main content
· 2/3/1940

Gifford v. Drolla-Scott Co.

Citations

  • 29 N.E.2d 964
  • 65 Ohio App. 367
  • 31 Ohio Law. Abs. 326
  • 18 Ohio Op. 531
  • 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “in limited circumstances, ‘and’ can be read in a several, that is, disjunctive, sense based on context and the specific way the word is used”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hornbeck, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.