Skip to main content
· 7/31/1985

Gifford-Hill Cement Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 615 F. Supp. 577
  • 9 Ct. Int'l Trade 357
  • 9 C.I.T. 357
  • 1985 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating in two-step analysis context: “[T]he Commission must rule in the affirmative if it finds even slight contribution from imports to material injury.”
  • finding desire for secondary supply source as reason for not regarding alleged lost sale as injurious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.