Giesbrecht v. Fitzgerald (In Re Giesbrecht)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an 16 interlocutory order denying confirmation “merged into the court’s 17 final confirmation order, and is sufficient to support appellate 18 jurisdiction of the earlier interlocutory order.”
• noting that an 16 interlocutory order denying confirmation “merged into the court’s 17 final confirmation order, and is sufficient to support appellate 18 jurisdiction of the earlier interlocutory order.”
• “the interlocutory Order Denying Confirmation merged into the court’s final [chapter 13] confirmation order, and is sufficient to support appellate jurisdiction of the earlier interlocutory order”
• interlocutory order denying plan confirmation merged into court's final confirmation order, thereby 10 in the best interest of creditors or public policy in violation of § 1129(a)(5
• “A 24 party has standing to appeal an order if it diminishes his or her 25 property, increases his or her burdens, or detrimentally affects 26 his or her rights.”
• “A 24 party has standing to appeal an order if it diminishes his or her 25 property, increases his or her burdens, or detrimentally affects 26 his or her rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).