Giertz-Richardson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that administrator was not wrong to credit opinions of independent reviewing doctors over plaintiff’s own doctors
• administrators “not required to automatically give significant weight to all subjective complaints” because benefits would always be payable based on those complaints
• “While Plaintiffs doctors believe that Plaintiff was unable to work, it was not wrong for Defendant to credit the opinions of the [] doctors that reviewed Plaintiffs medical records over the opinions of Plaintiffs [sic] doctors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).