Gidden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• oral findings of indirect criminal contempt stated on record are sufficient under rule 3.840(a)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gidden v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-04· cited 35×
• Schenck v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-09· cited 16×
• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-24

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ree v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-07-19· cited 179×
• Keezel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-09· cited 22×
• Ray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-07· cited 22×
• Vines v. Vines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-04-07· cited 19×
• Kahn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-11· cited 11×
• Wells v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-27· cited 9×
• Simkovitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-12-14· cited 8×
• White v. Buck
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-09· cited 6×
• Holden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-27· cited 4×
• Hofeling v. Hofeling
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-02· cited 4×
• Barnhill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-22· cited 3×
• Alexander v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-28· cited 2×