Skip to main content
· 12/10/1947

Gibson v. United States Lines

Citations

  • 74 F. Supp. 776
  • 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the state court’s interpretation of the defendant’s statement—“I got nothin[g] more to say to you. I’m done. This is over”—as equivocal because it could be interpreted as a negotiating ploy to be an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chesnut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.