Gibson v. Stehn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “under the wording of the Johnson Act, it is not enough that an intra-state rate-making policy merely ‘affect’ interstate commerce[;] [u]nless the effects of the policy amount to interference, the Johnson Act bars federal jurisdiction”
• stating that, “[e]ven if the complaint accurately could be characterized as seeking to enjoin the Commission only from calculating future rate orders using the imputation accounting method, future rate orders are a subset of the larger set comprising ‘any order affecting rates’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).