Skip to main content

Gibson v. State

Citations

  • 875 S.W.2d 58
  • 316 Ark. 705
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence that officer was employed by city as police officer was sufficient evidence that officer was discharging official duties when assaulted while off-duty
  • holding that an off-duty police officer working security for the apartment complex where he lived was acting as a police officer for purposes of charging a defendant with assaulting him in an altercation at the apartments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.