Gibson v. Philip Morris, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendants conducted an “improper and incomplete investigation” based in part on the fact that defendant admitted that he failed to allow the plaintiff to explain himself
• affirming trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff because defendant supervisor admitted that he failed to allow plaintiff to explain the complaints against him and no investigation was ever conducted into the truth of allegations against the plaintiff
• affirming trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff because defendant supervisor admitted that he failed to allow plaintiff to explain the complaints against him and no investigation was ever conducted into the truth of allegations against the plaintiff
• employer had sufficient interest to know and correct situation where there was suspicion of sale of its property by employees
• employer had sufficient interest to know and correct situation where there was suspicion of sale of its property by employees
• publication is essential element of cause of action for defamation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).