Gibson v. Pacific Summa Capital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “concurrent jurisdiction is presumed in the absence of exclu- sive federal jurisdiction” and that the circuit court had jurisdiction to determine “which of the two parties is entitled to exercise the limited rights that attach to valid unpatented mining claims” on federal land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).