· 9/15/1880
Gibson v. Northern Central Railway Co.
Citations
- 29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confession of judgment provision in original contract held not to apply to subsequent oral modification
- “It is true that a written contract may be modified by parol [... Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc., 435 Pa.Super. 93, 644 A.2d 1251, 1256 n. 5 (1994
- “It is true that a written contract may be modified by parol […].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Follett, Learned, Lockes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.