Gibson v. Neu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \[t]he doctrine of substantial performance does not apply\ in mortgage context where \timely payment of the debt was an essential condition of the promissory note [and] mortgage\
• holding, in the context of payments under a mortgage, that substantial performance did not apply where the “timely payment of the debt was an essential condition of the promissory note, mortgage, and release provision of the mortgage.”
• rejecting application of substantial performance doctrine where mortgagee owed only $500 on note
• “we must disagree that equitable subrogation applies only in refinance situations”
• discussing substantial performance of a contract provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).