Michigan Court of Appeals· 3/10/1998
Gibson v. Neelis
Citations
- 575 N.W.2d 313
- 227 Mich. App. 187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) is appropriate where the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
- carbon monoxide poisoning in apartment was premises liability action, though that claim was dismissed before appeal
- “[Djeviation from the language in a model act is presumed to be deliberate”
- \[D]eviation from the language in a model act is presumed to be deliberate\
- summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
- “ ‘If summary disposition is granted under one subpart of the court rule when it was actually appropriate under another, the defect is not fatal and does not preclude appellate review as long as the record permits review under the correct subpart.” ’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saad, Neff, Reilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-06-30· cited 146×
- Houghton Lake Area Tourism & Convention Bureau v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-04-02· cited 43×
- Kokx v. BylengaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 40×
- Pitsch v. Ese Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-04-21· cited 30×
- Sharp v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-02-23· cited 21×
- Detroit News, Inc. v. Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-09-24· cited 19×
- Michigan Basic Property Ins. Ass'n v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-06-26· cited 13×
- In Re LangMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-01· cited 12×
- Estes v. Idea Engineering & Fabricating, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-06-06· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-06-11· cited 74×
- Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-01-02· cited 47×
- Marx v. Department of CommerceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 23×
- Tiger Stadium Fan Club, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-09-04· cited 22×
- In Re Childress TrustMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-05-18· cited 22×
- Sanchez v. LagoudakisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-09-04· cited 20×
- Atkinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-05-15· cited 15×
- Tranker v. Figgie International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-04-04· cited 8×
- Ypsilanti Township v. Edward Rose Building Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-12-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.