Skip to main content
· 7/31/1973

Gibson v. Miami Valley Milk Producers, Inc.

Citations

  • 299 N.E.2d 631
  • 157 Ind. App. 218
  • 1973 Ind. App. LEXIS 1001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • doctrine of relation back does not permit addition of entirely new party after running of statute of limitations
  • when new rules effect only a remedy and not a vested right, they may be applied to pending litigation
  • when new rules affect only a remedy and not a vested right, they may be applied to pending litigation
  • it is “without dispute that the two year statute of limitations” barred claims under the Indiana antitrust statute
  • when new rules effect only a remedy and not a vested right, they may be applied to pending litigation
  • doctrine of relation back does not permit addition of entirely new party after running of statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.