Gibson v. MARJACK CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff's \unsubstantiated speculations\ insufficient to establish pretext by a preponderance of the evidence
• finding plaintiff’s “unsubstantiated speculations” insufficient to establish pretext by a preponderance of the evidence
• “To establish a causal connection between a protected activity and an adverse action, a plaintiff must prove that the protected activity preceded the adverse action and that the employer knew the employee engaged in a protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).