Gibson v. Kennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reasonable jury could find that a railroad conductor who was in charge of a train was acting within the scope of employment when he fought with a man he believed was unauthorized to ride the train and repeatedly struck the man with a lantern
• train conductor who assaulted passenger for failing to get off train was acting within the scope of his employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).