Gibson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the state as assignee of support rights did not have an attorney-client relationship with the support recipient and therefore a conflict of interest under DR 5-104 of Canon 5 of the Code of Professional Responsibility was not present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haney v. State
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-04-06· cited 58×
• Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Dooley
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-09-22· cited 16×
• Medsker v. Adult & Family Services Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-10-22· cited 9×
• State, Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Terry
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-02-11· cited 8×
• In Re Disciplinary Action Against Dooley
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-09-22· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Lester
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-24· cited 5×
• B.J.R.L. v. State of Utah
  D. Utah· 1987-01-28· cited 4×
• Nelson v. Adult & Family Services Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-10-29· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. McDonald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-10-22· cited 2×
• Florida Department of Revenue v. Collingwood
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-16· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Hansen v. McKay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-11-15· cited 8×
• Warlick v. Public Welfare Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-04· cited 5×
• Whallon v. Whallon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-11-10· cited 4×