Gibson v. Huie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to arbitrator with direction that liability should be 13 recalculated using the 7.5% assumption testified to as the best estimate absent 14 “additional evidence sufficient to support a different rate”
• in the context of mixed question review, applying clear error standard to the sub-issue of \[t]he Arbitrator's decision that the Segal Blend's use was reasonable in the aggregate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).