Gibson v. Halpern Enterprises

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “specific facts and circumstances of a case determine the reasonability of an inspection procedure” and finding that the reasonableness of a weekly inspection of a parking area was a jury question
• finding that whether a weekly inspection of a shopping center’s parking area was reasonable was a jury question
• question of fact about whether the pea-sized asphalt gravel “which was the same color as the slope” could have been detected on reasonable inspection
• question of fact about whether the pea-sized asphalt gravel “which was the same color as the slope” could have been detected on reasonable inspection
• “[A] proprietor has no duty to engage in an unduly burdensome inspection procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).