Skip to main content
· 2/7/2008

Gibson v. Freeman

Citations

  • 941 A.2d 1032
  • 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 24
  • 2008 WL 320184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying de novo review to the trial court’s interpretation of a rule of civil procedure
  • rejecting appellant’s argument that trial court erred in considering whether plaintiff had outlined plan for future service' of process and holding this was among “other factors” court could consider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrell, Fisher, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.