Gibson v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs could not discover information of vehicles outside the class vehicles because plaintiffs had not shown that components of different models shared the characteristics at issue in the class vehicles
• “In the absence of a sufficient showing of similarity to establish relevancy, a response to [] other incident discovery is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).