Gibraltar Rock, Inc. v. PA DEP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the petitioner in that case did not have habeas corpus available to him because he was not in custody
• acknowledging that the Supreme Court has not precluded “the possibility that the circumstances of a particular case might warrant consideration of a habeas petition by an Article III court prior to exhaustion.” (citing Councilman, 420 U.S. at 761)
• stating a coram nobis petition “may be filed at any time with- out limitation”
• reviewing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised via a coram nobis petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).