Gibney v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “arguments raised by the petitioners are based on factual questions that are best left for resolution in the first instance by the trial judge on a motion for new trial”
• appellate courts decline to decide “constitutional arguments raised by the petitioners [when they are] based on factual questions that are best left for resolution in the first instance by the trial judge on a motion for new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).