Gibert v. Randazzo
Citations
- 112 La. 1055
- 36 So. 852
- 1904 La. LEXIS 510
Syllabus
<p>DIVORCE — -EVIDENCE—REVIEW.</p> <p>1. In an action for divorce, in which the testimony is conflicting, much weight will be given to the decision of the district judge, who saw and heard the witnesses testify, and had the opportunity from personal observation to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.</p> <p>2. The testimony on which reliance is placed is that of two women, who, from their manner of testifying and their appearance, did not impress the judge of the court a qua.</p> <p>3.Without this testimony, the defendant has no cause to sustain his reconventional demand.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding seizure of iPhones in plain view constitutional where law enforcement “knew that [the defendant] was alleged to have participated in a drug conspiracy . . . and it was apparent to [the officer] that the cell phones were used in that trade”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.