Gibbs v. Porath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming sanction imposed upon Orkin in the absence of a motion or order to compel after Orkin provided a false interrogatory answer denying the existence of documents that later came to light
• “[W]hether [an expert’s opinion] is based upon hearsay goes to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility.”
• “[W]hether [an expert’s opinion] is based upon hearsay goes to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility.”
• “[W]hether [an expert’s opinion] is based upon hearsay goes to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility.”
• “[W]hether [an expert’s opinion] is based upon hearsay goes to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility.”
• expert medical testimony of pesticide exposure created a jury question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).