Skip to main content
· 3/6/1989

Gibbs v. Plymouth

Citations

  • 708 F. Supp. 270
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2576
  • 1989 WL 23270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e believe that some type of notice and an opportunity to respond are necessary when a district court seeks to revoke an attorney’s pro hac vice status.”
  • before revoking admission pro hac vice, attorney must be provided with notice and “a meaningful opportunity to respond to the identified charges”
  • “All that we will mandate is that the attorney be given a meaningful opportunity to respond to identified charges. Of course in certain cases a full hearing might be desirable, but we leave that to the discretion of the district court.”
  • requiring courts to provide specific notice of potentially sanctionable conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.