Gibbs v. Mark Porter Autoplex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, as a general rule, the failure to include variables in a regression analysis affects only the probativeness of the analysis, not its admissibility
• holding that each week's paycheck that delivers less on a discriminatory basis is a separate Title VII violation
• holding that, as a general rule, the failure to include variables in a regression analysis affects only the probativeness of the analysis, not its admissibility
• holding that each time an employer paid an employee less than other employees for a discriminatory reason constituted a separate unlawful employment practice
• holding that each week’s paycheck that delivers less to a black than to a similarly situated white is a wrong actionable under Title VII
• holding that perpetuation of salary discrepancies based on race were actionable under Title VII, regardless of the fact that the discriminatory practice began prior to Title VII’s effective date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).