Gibbons v. Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where prices between securities “fluctuate relative to one another [they] do not qualify as economically equivalent.”
• declining to recognize a novel theory of liability under Section 16(b) despite “the plausibility of [the plaintiff’s] interpretation”
• “[B]eing able to match the particular shares bought or sold is wholly irrelevant under [Section] 16(b)”
• \[T]he Agreements do allow access ... But the Agreements certainly do not allow redistribution of Bloomberg's data through UBS Delta.\
• “We . . . ‘constru[e] the complaint liberally, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor.’”
• failure to state a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).