Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “void” order entered by Commission “without giving proper and legal notice to petitioners as interested parties”
• noting that the Commission “can rescind, alter or amend its orders and decisions only after an opportunity to be heard has been given to all persons affected”
• determining decision of Commission was void where it failed to comply with its own rules and regulations concerning notice to interested parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).