Gibb v. Spiker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Chief of the Honolulu Police Department was not an agency because he did not adjudicate cases or promulgate rules
• holding that a police chief was not an “agency” under HRS § 91-1 because the police chief was not promulgating or enforcing any rules in his decision not to rehire a former police officer
• holding that “The decision not to rehire [the former police chief] based on an informal, unwritten policy against hiring anyone under investigation for possible criminal wrongdoing was a purely internal management function not within the scope of HRS § 91-1(4).”
• holding that “The decision not to rehire [the former police chief] based on an informal, unwritten policy against hiring anyone under investigation for possible criminal wrongdoing was a purely internal management function not within the scope of HRS § 91-1(4
• re-employment of police officer suspected of criminal conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).