· 4/1/1992
Giant Food Inc. v. Satterfield
Citations
- 603 A.2d 877
- 90 Md. App. 660
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is clear that per diem arguments are permissible in this state’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fischer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.