Second Circuit· 12/2/2008
Giannone v. York Tape & Label, Inc.
Citations
- 548 F.3d 191
- 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 775
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24461
- 2008 WL 5061808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that claim preclusion bars claims that “were or could have been raised” in a prior action (emphasis added)
- applying New York res judicata law to New York state court judgments
- “[W]hen de- termining the effect of a state court judgment, federal courts . . . are required to apply the preclusion law of the rendering state.”
- “Because Giannone’s State Action sought injunctive relief as well as a declaratory judgment, he may not avail himself of the ‘declaratory judgment exception’ to the doctrine of res judicata.”
- “Under New York law, a final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from relitigating issues that were or could have been raised in that action.” (internal citation omitted)
- “When ‘determin[ing] the effect of a state court judgment, federal courts . . . are required to apply the preclusion law of the rendering state.’” (quoting Conopco, Inc. v. Roll Int’l, 231 F.3d 82, 87 (2d Cir. 2000)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Hall, Gleeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoS.D. New York· 2016-01-26· cited 197×
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSecond Circuit· 2010-03-31· cited 101×
- Leon v. ShmuklerE.D. New York· 2014-01-17· cited 82×
- Graham v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-01-18· cited 50×
- Whitfield v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2024-03-15· cited 40×
- Barrington v. New YorkS.D. New York· 2011-08-26· cited 28×
- Logan v. MatveevskiiS.D. New York· 2016-03-30· cited 17×
- Robinson v. AllstateW.D. New York· 2010-03-30· cited 16×
- Zapotocky v. Cit Bank, N.A.S.D. Illinois· 2018-06-21· cited 5×
- Malcolm v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2015-10-28· cited 3×
- Travelers Insurance v. Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane Ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S.S.D. New York· 2010-02-04
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.Second Circuit· 2000-11-03· cited 258×
- MATTER OF JOSEY v. GoordNew York Court of Appeals· 2007-12-20· cited 256×
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Second Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 104×
- Harborside Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. Howard Vogel Edward BenensonSecond Circuit· 1992-03-18· cited 45×
- Maflo Holding Corp. v. S. J. Blume, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1955-06-09· cited 25×
- Jefferson Towers, Inc. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-08· cited 14×
- Lynch v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1951-11-27· cited 11×
- Lynch v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals· 1952-07-15· cited 11×
- Lynch v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court· 1950-06-29· cited 7×
- Lynch v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court· 1949-01-27· cited 4×
- Inderlied v. WhaleyNew York Supreme Court· 1895-02-15· cited 4×
- Gross v. TannenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-06-30· cited 4×
Other cases named Giannone v. York Tape & Label, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.