Skip to main content
· 2/26/1999

Giannacopoulos v. Credit Suisse

Citations

  • 37 F. Supp. 2d 626
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2357
  • 1999 WL 118163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Parties cannot demand judicial protection when they could have protected themselves with a reasonable inquiry into any misrepresented facts”’
  • “[W]here parties have access to information that could expose a misrepresentation, courts will not find their reliance sufficiently justifiable to merit legal protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.