Skip to main content
· 2/27/2012

Gianino v. Alacer Corp.

Citations

  • 846 F. Supp. 2d 1096
  • 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1162
  • 2012 WL 724322
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the two-year, catch-all statute of limitations period contained in § 55–2–12 governs” West Virginia Code § 31-17-8(m)(8)
  • holding that “the two-year, catch-all statute of limitations period contained in § 55–2–12 governs” West Virginia Code § 31-17-8(m)(8)
  • holding that “the two-year, catch-all statute of limitations period contained in § 55–2–12 governs” West Virginia Code § 31- 17-8(m)(8)
  • concluding “the two-year, catch-all statute of limitations period contained in [W. Va. Code] § 55– 2–12 governs” actions brought under W. Va. Code § 31-17-8
  • denying summary judgment when, amongst other factors, two entities allegedly entered into a contract agreeing to engage in a single business enterprise—the sale of a particular product— and one entity had an exclusive relationship with the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.