Gianfrancesco v. Town of Wrentham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “a pattern of selective and excessive enforcement of municipal regulations” did not “plausibly allege” a substantive due process violation
• explaining that prudential standing includes the additional standing requirement that a party “assert his own legal rights and interests”
• explaining that prudential standing includes the additional standing requirement that a party “assert his own legal rights and interests”
• deferring consideration of restaurant proprietor's statutory standing to challenge the validity of municipal land-use regulations as applied to property owned by the restaurant itself
• upholding dismissal of claims where there was \no suggestion\ that the \missing facts should be beyond [plaintiff's] reach\ or that the plaintiff \lack[ed] the information needed to\ allege such facts
• deferring consideration of restaurant proprietor’s statutory standing to challenge the validity of municipal land-use regulations as applied to property owned by the restaurant itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).