Gianfrancesco v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was “no occasion to resolve [whether unjust enrichment claim was preempted] because at best [unjust enrichment] is only an alternative ground of action to that breach of contract which we have sustained”
• unjust enrichment claim under Virginia law preempted in face of an undisputed express contract
• parties' right and duties growing out of contractual relationship wholly defined by express contract
• “[I]f a court finds that an express contract exists between the parties, either by determination of the court or stipulation of the parties, the equitable remedy of unjust enrichment is unavailable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).