Giancola v. JohnsonDiversey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the interests of judicial economy, we now by-pass [sic] that potentially thorny [jurisdictional] issue to reach the relatively easy merits of this appeal.”
• “In the interests of judicial economy, we now by-pass that potentially thorny [jurisdictional] issue to reach the relatively easy merits of this appeal.”
• “In the interests of judicial economy, we now by-pass that potentially thorny [jurisdictional] issue to reach the relatively easy merits of this appeal.”
• “In the interests of judicial economy, we now by-pass [sic] that potentially thorny [jurisdictional] issue to reach the relatively easy merits of this appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ada Conde-Vidal v. Rene Pinto Lugo
  First Circuit· 2020-07-29
• La Trinidad Elderly, LP, SE v. Loiza Ponce Holdings LLC
  First Circuit· 2021-06-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Link v. Wabash Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
• United States v. Romain
  First Circuit· 2004-12-30· cited 164×
• Hmg Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 134×
• Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, L.P.
  First Circuit· 2005-10-21· cited 44×
• Georcely v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2004-07-12· cited 37×
• Harris v. Walsh
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 19×
• Rivera-Martinez v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2004-11-04· cited 10×
• Toolasprashad v. DeRosa
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 7×