GIACOMETTI, ADAM v. FARRELL, JACOB B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where a sentencing court is informed by a PSI, we presume it is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations
• stating that where a trial court is informed by a PSI report, it is presumed that the court is aware of all sentencing factors and its discretion should not be disturbed
• stating that where a trial court is informed by a PSI report, it is presumed that the court is aware of all sentencing factors and its discretion should not be disturbed
• concluding “that police acted reasonably and pursuant to the community caretaking doctrine when observing [Edwards] limping, with a bloody leg, at 1:20 a.m., in that they approached and offered [Edwards] medical assistance”
• concluding “that police acted reasonably and pursuant to the community caretaking doctrine when observing [Edwards] limping, with a bloody leg, at 1:20 a.m., in that they approached and offered [Edwards] medical assistance”
• finding a substantial question for review where the defendant claimed that the trial court relied on an improper factor when imposing its sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).