Giacomelli v. Scottsdale Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it may nonetheless be relevant “in determining whether ambiguity exists”
• “[A] split in authority over the interpretation of language in an insurance policy... is a factor that we will consider in determining whether ambiguity exists.”
• split in authority over the meaning of policy language is \additional support for concluding that there was ambiguity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).