Giacini v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The uncontradicted testimony of the supervisor that he was a supervising officer authorized to implement roadblocks is sufficient to establish the fact.”
• “The uncontradicted testimony of [a] supervisor that he was a supervising officer authorized to implement roadblocks is sufficient to establish the fact. [Cit.]”
• mere presence at roadblock does not deprive officer of supervisory status if he is acting in supervisory capacity
• mere presence at a roadblock does not deprive an officer of supervisory status if he is acting in a supervisory capacity
• The mere fact that the deciding officer was present at the scene of the roadblock did not deprive him of “supervisory” status, because he was present in a supervisory capacity.
• The mere fact that the deciding officer was present at the scene of the roadblock did not deprive him of “supervisory” status, because he was present in a supervisory capacity.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).