GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If an agency promulgates a regulation without regard for what Congress has said on the matter, however, the purpose for deference evaporates.”
• “OPM’s argument ignores the fungible nature of money. It makes little or no difference whether reconciliation results in cash payments or in adjustments to future rates.”
• “OPM’s argument ignores the fungible nature of money. It makes little or no difference whether reconciliation results in cash payments or in adjustments to future rates.”
• “It is not our place to compensate for any deficiencies that may exist with the agency’s proffered explanations. We are only to evaluate the agency’s stated rationales, not supply our own.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).