Ghrist v. Fricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing petition to terminate parental rights as in substance a petition to determine paternity and to legitimate the child, issues over which superior court had jurisdiction
• applying collateral estoppel to mother’s statement of paternity contained in settlement agreement because “[pJarties to stipulations and agreements entered into in the cootse of judicial proceedings are estopped from taking positions inconsistent therewith”
• applying collateral estoppel to mother's statement of paternity contained in settlement agreement because \[p]arties to stipulations and agreements entered into in the course of judicial proceedings are estopped from taking positions inconsistent therewith\
• applying collateral estoppel to the mother's statement of paternity contained in a settlement agreement because \[p]arties to stipulations and agreements entered into in the course of judicial proceedings are estopped from taking positions inconsistent therewith\
• applying collateral estoppel to the mother’s statement of paternity contained in a settlement agreement because “[pjarties to stipulations and agreements entered into in the course of judicial proceedings are estopped from taking positions inconsistent therewith”
• applying collateral estoppel to mother’s statement of paternity contained in settlement agreement because “[p]arties to stipulations and agreements entered into in the course of judicial proceedings are estopped from taking positions inconsistent therewith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).