Skip to main content
· 2/9/1931

Gherwal v. United States

Citations

  • 46 F.2d 998
  • 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the defendant’s sentence was not unconstitutional because the maximum sentence allowed by law for first-degree theft was at least five years’ probation, which was greater than the four years’ probation that the defendant received for second-degree theft
  • comparing the defendant’s sentence on a lesser-included misdemeanor to, inter alia, the maximum departure sentence available on a greater-inclusive felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.