Ghersi v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an employer had the right to control the details of a contract employee’s work where the employer exercised control over “[w]hen, where, and how” the contract employee was to work
• stating that without consent to the employment relationship, “there can be no employment relationship for purposes of workers’ compensation” under Utah’s workers’ compensation law (citations omitted)
• finding that when essential facts are undisputed, courts may determine as matter of law employment status in context of workers’ compensation statute’s exclusive remedy provision
• stating that without consent to the employment relationship, “there can be no employment relationship for purposes of workers’ compensation” under Utah’s workers’ compensation law (citations omitted)
• “When an employee of a temporary labor service who has the right to accept or decline an assignment accepts an assignment, he enters into an implied contract of hire with the [borrowing] employer.”
• “Almost without exception, courts have relied on the loaned employee doctrine to hold that the special employer of a temporary employee is an employer for workers’ compensation purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).