Gharda USA, Inc. and Gharda Chemicals, Ltd. v. Control Solutions, Inc., United Phosphorus, Inc., and Mark Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert’s opinion that manufacturing process “could” have resulted in contaminated product was unreliable speculation
• holding that expert causation testimony was required because “[t]he plaintiffs’ causation theory in th[e] case [wa]s complex”
• noting that experts may rely on other experts’ opinions and data so long as the other experts’ opinions and data is also reliable
• stating that a trial court’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• stating that trial court’s rulings on admissibility of evidence are reviewed for abuse of discretion
• explaining that an expert opinion is unreliable when it assumes a fact the expert is unable to determine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).