Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

Ghanem v. Upchurch

Citations

  • 481 F.3d 222
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5237
  • 2007 WL 666091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that revocation \at any time\ \also connotes discretion\
  • finding the statutory language to indicate that § 1155 was discretionary and courts were stripped of jurisdiction to review it
  • finding that revocation “at any time” “also connotes discretion”
  • \We interpret the phrase `for what he deems' as vesting complete discretion in the Secretary to determine what constitutes good and sufficient cause.\
  • “We interpret the phrase ‘for what he deems’ as vesting com- plete discretion in the Secretary[.]”
  • “We interpret the phrase ‘for what he deems’ as vesting complete discretion in the Secretary to determine what constitutes good and sufficient cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Demoss, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.