Ghahremani v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that question of whether petitioner established \due diligence\ in discovering deception, fraud, or error in motion to reopen context is a mixed question over which we have jurisdiction
• holding that interim lawyers’s failure to inform petitioner of his first lawyer’s deficiencies does not undermine petitioner’s exercise of due diligence
• holding that a petitioner acted with due diligence where he “demonstrated a steadfast pursuit of his case” despite his “complete ignorance” of his original lawyer’s errors
• holding that question of whether petitioner established “due diligence” in discovering deception, fraud, or error in motion to reopen context is a mixed question over which we have jurisdiction
• holding that issues raised but 22 not adequately supported are considered abandoned
• explaining that issues not discussed in the body of the opening brief are deemed abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).