GEWIN v. Dodrill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• diseussing “why, even assuming the petitions were not procedurally barred, they would fail on the merits”
• applying § 2255(f)(1) because “[the defendant] has never suggested—let alone provided any evidence in support of such a suggestion—that the limitations period should be de- termined according to one of the other triggering events specified in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).